a lot of anti-religious art. Here's one for example:
Van der Leeuw goes on to quote Maritain by saying, "If you want to make Christian art, be Christians, and seek to make a beautiful work, in which your entire heart lies; do not try to make it Christian" (336). If art is imitation of God's creation, then this makes sense. However, if the artist is not a Christian, is the art still Christian? Does the intention behind the art effect the way people view it? Lets say that a non-religious person creates a beautiful landscape painting. Is this Christian because it exhibits creation? What about a photograph?
Maritain also says, "Everywhere where art-whether Egyptian, Greek, or Chinese-has attained a certain level and a certain degree of purity, it is in expectation already Christian, because all spiritual radiance is the promise and image of the divine weighing out of the Gospel" (336). According to Maritain, the art, not the artist, is the deciding factor of "religious" art. True religious art is art that does not have to include symbols or common religious images in order to convey the divine.
No comments:
Post a Comment